Writers—especially writers in the throes of trying to conceptualize a book length research project—often forget that the audience’s ability to engage with the topic is mediated by the text.There is a tendency to provide too much background information in the introduction.As we saw above, quite how much information you present in your thesis will depend on whether you have a standalone literature review or methods chapter.
Writers—especially writers in the throes of trying to conceptualize a book length research project—often forget that the audience’s ability to engage with the topic is mediated by the text.There is a tendency to provide too much background information in the introduction.As we saw above, quite how much information you present in your thesis will depend on whether you have a standalone literature review or methods chapter.Tags: Peace Like A River Analysis EssayPublic Policy Analysis EssaysTopic For Research ProposalNetworking Research PapersCover Letter For Office Manager PositionEssay Natural Disaster Flood
While I realize that it may sound a little rigid, I think such an approach is warranted here.
Using this type of structure can give thesis writers an opportunity to come to a much better understanding of what they are trying to say.
In other words, in my experience, thesis writers tend to feel better after reconstructing their introductions along these lines.
For some, it may prove a useful way to present their introduction in their final draft; for other, it may just be a useful scaffold, something that they can improve upon once everything is on a surer footing. Typically, the thesis introductions that I see provide an introduction to the topic but not necessarily to the piece of writing.
You have to find a way of giving them the big picture before the deep context. You are writing your thesis on the reappearance of thestrals in the 1980s in Mirkwood Forest in the remote country of Archenland after a devastating forest fire caused by mineral extraction in the 1950s.* How are you going to structure an introduction in such a way that your reader doesn’t have to read 10 pages of bewildering and seemingly unconnected background?
When a thesis writer attempts to give the full context before elaborating the problem, two things will happen.First, the reader will labour to see the significance of all that they are being told.Second, the reader will, in all likelihood, struggle to find connections between the various aspects of the context.Once you have explained what we need to know about thestrals, you will need to discuss the topography of Mirkwood, the endangered species policy framework in Archenland, the mineral extraction practices commonly used in the 1950s, and the way forest fires affect animal populations.If you haven’t started with your problem—the thing that brings these disparate areas into a meaningful conversation with each other—your introduction will begin with a baffling array of potentially disconnected bits of information.If you must talk about any of these in the introduction, be sure to offer clear and concise definitions.A failure to do so means that the reader is left confused.One possibility: look to see if your campus is having a Three Minutes Thesis competition this term; the first round at U of T is being held on March 22.When I approach a thesis introduction, I start from the assumption that the reader shouldn’t have to wait to hear your guiding problem until they have the full context to that problem.Read our guide to Now you know how to present your research as clearly and concisely as possible.Your reader (and examiner) will thank you, because they'll be able to understand exactly what your study is about just from reading the introductory pages.