Tags: School Accounting System ThesisAmerican History Student EssaysThesis Soft Binding SwanseaPersonal Essay In Third Person100 Page EssaysThe Castle Rob Sitch EssayMarcuse Essay LiberationTypical College Essay QuestionsTextiles Coursework Gcse Research AnalysisEssays On Canterbury Tales The Knight
” The core of their response is a consideration of “canonicity”: a case study can be philosophically informative if it is canonical with respect to a particular philosophical aim.
The adeptness with which both historical and philosophical concerns are handled in this essay is a clear sign of a productive collaboration between the co-authors across the philosophy/history boundary.
The runner-up essay by conveys an excellent sense of the history of the methodological debates, demonstrating a firm command of the relevant literature and providing an insightful overall perspective on the problem of history–philosophy interaction.
And the appreciation of relevant historical contingencies is crucial for the identification of a canonical case.
Bolinska and Martin offer an illuminating analysis of the concept of contingency, disambiguating it from the notion of chance and showing how it is crucially implicated in the historical-cum-philosophical explanation of past scientific episodes.
Presenting at the Congress will be a condition of the award.
The award will carry a cash prize of US$ 1,000 and, in addition, a waiver of the Congress registration fee.
The 2017 prize was won by Theodore Arabatzis of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, for his essay “ What’s in it for the historian of science? All entries should contain original work that has not previously been published.
For entries written originally in another language, an English translation should be submitted, with an indication of the translator.
Martin of the University of Cambridge for their essay “Negotiating History: Contingency, Canonicity, and Case Studies”.
In discussing remedies to these difficulties, Bolinska and Martin focus on the “metaphysical” type of worry: “what if history itself is just inherently unsuited to providing evidential support for philosophical claims?