Is it nobler to put up with all the nasty things that luck throws your way, or to fight against all those troubles by simply putting an end to them once and for all?
Dying, sleeping—that’s all dying is—a sleep that ends all the heartache and shocks that life on earth gives us—that’s an achievement to wish for. Ah, but there’s the catch: in death’s sleep who knows what kind of dreams might come, after we’ve put the noise and commotion of life behind us. That’s the consideration that makes us stretch out our sufferings so long.
His opening shot at Jane Austen’s Mansfield Park is spot on in praising Austen as a writer while accurately analysing what is most annoying about this particular story.
One of his targets appears at least twice in this collection, which is religion, and in particular Christianity.
However, Amis's famous attack on translation appears here as a one-line aside during an interview with a visiting poet.3. However, he apparently isn't brave enough to explain himself.
After setting the scene for an attack on a canonized author, Amis says he "doesn't want to have (his) windows smashed in by Lawrence vigilantes" and instead criticizes an obscure author who literally no one alive today has read.He truly convinced me.______________________________________Many readers will no doubt be surprised to hear this, but until a few minutes ago I was unaware that paraphrases of Hamlet are, in fact, readily available on the Internet.For people as poorly informed as I was, here is the Spark Notes version of the soliloquy from Act 3, Scene 1: The question is: is it better to be alive or dead?Though published in 1967, do these words remind you of anything occurring in November 2009?"You cannot decide to have brotherhood; if you start trying to enforce it, you will before long find yourself enforcing something very different, and much worse than mere absence of brotherhood. I like that." ~Kingsley Amis, italics in original"What Became of Jane Austen" was actually the first book placed on my to-read shelf. Amis's critique of Jane Austen-Although he did allude to the famous bit about Austen spendin"What Became of Jane Austen" was actually the first book placed on my to-read shelf. Amis's critique of Jane Austen-Although he did allude to the famous bit about Austen spending too long on the unimportant and glossing over the important, the titular essay was all of four pages long.Kingsley's a far kinder atheist than the Hitch, and in the final essay "On Christ's Nature" he gives Jesus a couple of soft compliments.Needless to say, he demonstrates a profound misunderstanding not only of Christ's nature, but of his own nature.If you compare this collection of lit crit and pop rumination to similar recent efforts by Updike, Hitchens, or even Amis' son Martin, you'll find it far more If anyone on staff is interested, I'd be happy to submit a scan of the dust jacket of my copy. It features six snapshots of a few of the figures Amis is concerned with in his essays, Jane Austen, Christopher Lee (the actor), Charles Dickens, DH Lawrence, Peter Cushing (the actor), and Ian Fleming.If you compare this collection of lit crit and pop rumination to similar recent efforts by Updike, Hitchens, or even Amis' son Martin, you'll find it far more readable, if you're anything like me.These are particularly egregious (and illuminating of his character) in the two essays in question.I found the following quotation from the essay on Amis' political views to be exquisitely timely.