Critical Thinking Questions With Answers

Critical Thinking Questions With Answers-13
Especially because the dip below the stable 4 percent ratewas temporary, this unusual occurrence cannot be used as the basis for predicting a trend.

Especially because the dip below the stable 4 percent ratewas temporary, this unusual occurrence cannot be used as the basis for predicting a trend.

Tags: Thesis For Pro Life SpeechGreat Essays 2nd Edition FolseCreative Writing UniScience And Technology Advancement EssayMacbeth Character EssaysEssay On Our Economy TodayHigher English Essays Great GatsbySocial Studies Education EssaySmall Business Marketing Plan ExamplesHow To Write An Effective Persuasive Essay

If this information were provided, it would weaken support for the conclusion. Option E : Difficulty of access to the trees could provide a disincentive to their harvesting—but we are not told that it would prevent their harvesting. For similar carsand comparable drivers, automobile insurance for collision damage has always costmore in Great port than in Fairmont.

Since it is not provided, this option does not significantly weaken the argument. Police studies, however, show thatcars owned by Greatport residents are, on average, slightly less likely to be involved in a collision than cars in Fairmont.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakensthe conclusion above?

Option A : As long as the sample wasrepresentative, the figures should be accurate. Option B Correct : This statement suggests that the 1.2 percent inflation rate is an unusual occurrence in recent years.

Option A : The method of the drug's distribution is irrelevant, unless the central authority can limit the drug's production from the bark of wild ibora trees. Option B : The cost of producing the drug does notaffect the outcome for the treeunless it deters production.

Option C : The existence of uses for other parts of the tree opens the possibility that the ibora-bark drug would cause no increase in destruction of trees other than what exists already.

The information is sufficient tojustify a little doubt about the argument's conclusion—but not at all specific enough to undermine the argument's conclusion as much as does answer choice (B).

Option E : The failure of government intervention to affect the rate of inflation could be seen to support, not weaken, the conclusion. Thyrian lawmaker: Thyria's Cheese Importation Board inspects all cheese shipments to Thyria and rejects shipments not meeting specified standards. Therefore, since the health consequences and associated economic costs of not rejecting that 1 percent are negligible, whereas the board's operating costs are considerable, for economic reasons alone the board should be disbanded. The threat of having their shipments rejected deters many cheese exporters from shipping substandard product.

It follows, therefore, that continued production of the drug must inevitably lead to the ibora's extinction.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Critical Thinking Questions With Answers

The Latest from detmagazine.ru ©