Conclude Level History Essay

The question already asks you to pick one example, so your job is not simply to reiterate that information, but to explain what kind of example Jordan presents.

The question already asks you to pick one example, so your job is not simply to reiterate that information, but to explain what kind of example Jordan presents.

Tags: Uk Essay Writers OnlineSpace Writing PaperCause And Effect Research Paper TopicsEssay Of EconomicEssay On Contemporary Social IssuesAnalysis Essay On Beowulf

- draw your readers in- culminate in a thesis statement that clearly states your argument- orient your readers to the key facts they need to know in order to understand your thesis- lay out a roadmap for the rest of your paper Often students get slowed down in paper-writing because they are not sure how to write the introduction.

Do not feel like you have to write your introduction first simply because it is the first section of your paper. Be specific in your analysis, and draw on at least one of the scholars of nationalism that we discussed in class.”Here is an example of a introduction for this prompt:“One of the most important tasks the leader of any country faces is how to build a united and strong nation.

Second, it tells your reader why your argument matters.

In your conclusion, you want to take a step back and consider briefly the historical implications or significance of your topic.

You can always come back to it after you write the body of your essay. The thesis statement To see how to navigate these three parts in practice, look at the below examples of a weak and strong introduction. This has been especially true in the Middle East, where the country of Jordan offers one example of how states in the region approached nation-building.

Whenever you approach your introduction, think of it as having three key parts:1. Suppose you are taking a Near Eastern history class and your professor has distributed the following paper prompt:“In a 4-5 page paper, describe the process of nation-building in one Middle Eastern state. Founded after World War I by the British, Jordan has since been ruled by members of the Hashemite family.

To help them face the difficult challenges of founding a new state, they employed various strategies of nation-building.”Now, here is a version of that same introduction:“Since 1921, when the British first created the mandate of Transjordan and installed Abdullah I as its emir, the Hashemite rulers have faced a dual task in nation-building.

First, as foreigners to the region, the Hashemites had to establish their legitimacy as Jordan’s rightful leaders.

Second, given the arbitrary boundaries of the new nation, the Hashemites had to establish the legitimacy of Jordan itself, binding together the people now called ‘Jordanians.’ To help them address both challenges, the Hashemite leaders crafted a particular narrative of history, what Anthony Smith calls a ‘nationalist mythology.’ By presenting themselves as descendants of the Prophet Muhammad, as leaders of the Arab Revolt, and as the fathers of Jordan’s different tribal groups, they established the authority of their own regime and the authority of the new nation, creating one of the most stable states in the modern Middle East.”The first draft of the introduction, while a good initial step, is not strong enough to set up a solid, argument-based paper.

Here are the key issues: “One of the most important tasks the leader of any country faces is how to build a united and strong nation.”- This first sentence is too general.