Animal Cloning Essays

Animal Cloning Essays-65
One Head is Better Than Two The question of cloning has been one of the most recently controversial issues of the past decade.For humans to consider the cloning of one another forces them all to question the very concepts of right and wrong that make them all human. Scientists have debated the implication of human and non-human cloning since 1997 when scientists at the Roslin Institute in Scotland produced Dolly.In bioethics, the ethics of cloning refers to a variety of ethical positions regarding the practice and possibilities of cloning, especially human cloning.

Tags: 5th Doctoral Thesis ConferenceSat Essay SubscoreHow To Solve Algebra 2 ProblemsTopics For A Sociology Research PaperHelp With Essay WritingPrintable Business Plan TemplateXavier University Application Essay

It is understood that advances in technology have made man's life happier, longer, and healthier, and I am all for advancing but destroying life to create life is unjustified.

With the results of cloning possibly curing Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, and heart disease who could possibly be against it?

The prominent Qatari scholar Yusuf Al Qaradawi believes that cloning specific parts of the human body for medical purposes is not prohibited in Islam, but cloning the whole human body would not be permitted under any circumstances.

On the issue of animal ethics he takes a more lenient position.

This would negate the exploitation of animals in scientific research on cloning, cloning used in food production, or as other resources for human use or consumption.

The Roman Catholic Church, under the papacy of Benedict XVI, condemned the practice of human cloning, in the magisterial instruction Dignitas Personae, stating that it represents a "grave offense to the dignity of that person as well as to the fundamental equality of all people." Other Christian denominations such as the United Church of Christ do not believe a fertilized egg constitutes a living being, but still they oppose the cloning of embryonic cells.

Most scientific, governmental and religious organizations oppose reproductive cloning.

The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and other scientific organizations have made public statements suggesting that human reproductive cloning be banned until safety issues are resolved.

The World Council of Churches, representing nearly 400 Christian denominations worldwide, opposed cloning of both human embryos and whole humans in February 2006.

The United Methodist Church opposed research and reproductive cloning in May 2000 and again in May 2004.


Comments Animal Cloning Essays

The Latest from ©